Welcome to the Industrial Executive!

I’m super glad you’re here.

Let’s get to it!

But first, a word from our sponsors at Axiom Manufacturing Systems:

Stuck hitting the same production ceiling while your budget's locked down?

Most plant managers are sitting on 15-30% (maybe even 50%) untapped capacity, they just don't know where to look. At Axiom, we help you find it without buying new equipment, hiring more people, or waiting for next year's capital budget.

Ready to unlock what you already have?

Book Your 30-Minute Strategy Call →

New research shows AI is crushing entry-level opportunities in software development and accounting - 13% decline for workers aged 22-25 in "AI-exposed" fields. Meanwhile, experienced workers? Barely a scratch.

Here's what caught my attention:

The disruption happened fastest in jobs where AI automates work, not where it augments it.

For example: Entry-level manufacturing jobs remain largely immune to this trend. You still need human hands to operate equipment, troubleshoot line issues, and manage physical processes.

While fresh accounting grads are competing with ChatGPT for spreadsheet work, your entry-level technicians are learning skills that can't be replicated by software - at least not yet.

Smart plant managers are already capitalizing on this. They're recruiting talent that might have otherwise gone into tech or finance, offering clear advancement paths from operator to supervisor to engineering roles. While Silicon Valley talks about AI replacing workers, manufacturing is becoming one of the most AI-resistant career paths for young talent.

If you're struggling to attract young workers, lead with job security. In an AI-disrupted economy, manufacturing skills are looking pretty bulletproof.

Just wrapped up a consulting call where a plant manager spent 45 minutes explaining why their new MES system wasn't working.

Plot twist:

The MES was working perfectly.

The real problem? They never defined what "working" meant in the first place.

This conversation reminded me of something Jeff Bezos once said about Amazon's early days: "We are stubborn on vision. We are flexible on details." Manufacturing leaders need to flip this script entirely.

Be stubborn on your operational mission. Be ruthlessly flexible on your methods.

Here's what I see happening in plants across the Midwest:

A VP of Operations reads about Industry 4.0 at a conference. Gets excited. Comes back and announces a "digital transformation initiative."

Six months later, they have:

Sound familiar?

The issue isn't the technology. The issue is falling in love with the solution before understanding the problem.

In instances like these, manufacturing executives need to steal the 80/20 (20% of actions drive 80% of results) mindset.

When you're obsessed with fixing throughput bottlenecks, you don't care if the answer comes from:

When you're married to "implementing Industry 4.0," you end up throwing money at problems you haven't properly diagnosed.

The best manufacturing leaders I know - the ones who actually deliver ROI on their technology investments - ask these questions first:

1. What specific operational problem keeps me up at night?

Not "we need better visibility into our operations." That's meaningless consultant-speak.

Try: "Our changeover times on Line 3 are 23% longer than industry benchmark, costing us $47K per month in lost production."

2. How will I measure success in dollars and cents?

If you can't put a number on it, you can't manage it. Period.

"Improved efficiency" isn't a success metric. "Reduced changeover time from 45 minutes to 32 minutes, saving $564K annually" is.

3. What's the simplest way to test if this approach works?

Before you spend $2.3M on a comprehensive MES rollout, can you pilot it on one line for two months?

Before you implement plant-wide predictive maintenance, can you start with your most critical asset?

This is straight out of Eric Ries' Lean Startup playbook, applied to manufacturing operations.

Let me show you how this works in practice:

Case Study: Midwest Automotive Supplier

Their mission was crystal clear: Reduce unplanned downtime by 40% within 12 months to avoid penalty clauses with their Tier 1 customer.

They tested three methods simultaneously:

Results after 90 days:

They doubled down on method 2, added method 3, and shelved the expensive sensors.

Total investment: $8K. Result: 49% reduction in unplanned downtime. Annual savings: $1.2M.

AI, digital twins, predictive maintenance, advanced analytics - they're all just tools in your toolkit.

Your mission should be laser-focused and measurable. Your methods should be experimental and adaptable.

Here's the counterintuitive truth: The most successful digital transformations I've seen started with the lowest-tech solutions first.

Why? Because when you solve problems with simple methods first, you:

Want to know if your digital transformation strategy is on the right track?

Apply this 90-day litmus test:

Week 1-2: Define your operational mission in specific, measurable terms Week 3-4: Identify three different methods that could solve this problem Week 5-8: Run cheap, fast pilots of each method Week 9-12: Measure results and double down on what works

If you can't show meaningful progress in 90 days, your approach is probably wrong.

Technology vendors want to sell you solutions. Consultants want to sell you frameworks. Your CEO wants to see results.

The path forward isn't complicated:

The manufacturing leaders who master this principle aren't just surviving the next recession - they're positioning themselves to dominate when their competition is still debugging their dashboards.

And that’s all folks!

Till next week,

The Industrial Executive